"A photograph may be worth a thousand words, but even at its most
revealing it never tells an entire story. It is the capture of a single
moment, a split-second version of the truth. But if it is an
effective photograph, it moves the viewer toward a larger truth.
That’s certainly the case for a front-page
photograph published Nov. 15, an image of a man’s anguish as he held the
shrouded body of his 11-month-old son, who was killed in a bomb strike on the man’s house in Gaza.
That
the man is Palestinian — not a terrorist but a journalist — and that
the bomb was dropped by Israelis, to my mind, is almost beside the
point. This photo depicted loss and pain, the horrific cost to innocents
on both sides of the violence in the Middle East.
But many Post
readers saw it differently. Jewish groups and American Jews in large
numbers wrote to the ombudsman and to Post editors, protesting the photo
as biased.
MaryAnne Golon, The Post’s director of photography,
explained to me that the purpose of any front-page photo, regardless of
subject, is to move the reader, whether through its beauty, sentiment or
drama.
“When we looked at the selection that night of Middle
East photos from the wire services, this photo got everyone in the gut,”
Golon said. “It went straight to the heart, this sobbing man who just
lost his baby son.”
Post staff then authenticated and verified the
facts behind the Associated Press photo. The dead baby was real. The
bombing was real.
Many readers asked why The Post didn’t balance
the photo of the grieving father with one of Israelis who had lost a
loved one from the Gaza rocket fire. That’s a valid question.
The
answer is that The Post cannot publish photographs that don’t exist. No
Israeli civilian had been killed by Gaza rocket fire since
Oct. 29, 2011, more than a year earlier. The first Israeli civilian deaths from Gaza rocket fire in 2012 did not take place until
Nov. 15,
when Hamas, the group that controls Gaza, began firing more accurate
and deadly missiles in response to the Israeli offensive that had begun
the day before. There were no recent photos of Israeli casualties to be
had on the night of
Nov. 14." (thanks Michele)