Look at this article. It basically says that many journalists have been kidnapped and killed by Syrian rebels but insist that it is not a big deal because the regime is worse, and then conclude by saying that due to Syrian rebel crimes, the Western coverage of Syria has become biased in favor of the regime. I am not making this up. As nutty as you can get. "As a result, coverage of the regime has become kinder." So the Economist does not think that Western media are biased enough in favor of the rebels. (thanks Khelil)