Racism of the Nation magazine

The Nation magazine wrote this: "J Street is joined by other good activist groups, such as Americans for Peace Now and Jewish Voice for Peace. Most of Congress has been shamefully quiescent, but Representative Dennis Kucinich has spoken out courageously against the violence, as have several other members lauded by J Street. And on the first day of Israel's ground invasion, 10,000 Israelis took part in a massive peace demonstration." But this entire editorial displays the racism/sectarianism that is at the heart of the American liberal movement. First, notice the editorial does not even mention the demonstrations and protests by Arab-Americans or Muslim-Americans, and also by Arabs and Muslims around the world. Those sandniggers just don't count, as far as the Nation magazine is concerned. They took note of the protests by the superior people of Israel (notice how desperate the Nation magazine is to prove that there is a "peace camp" in Israel to the point of inflating the figures for the demonstration), and they alone count when Nation editors sit down to formulate an editorial policy. So basically, it is saying that we can hope for an end of the "fighting" because many Zionists support that end. And notice that last paragraph which contains the recipe of the Nation magazine for "peace" in the Middle East. They invoke the King `Abdullah "peace" plan, and they audaciously mention "a fair and agreed on resolution of the refugee question." Fair and agreed on? Agreed on by whom? The usurpers or the original inhabitants? And you call it a "refugee question"? And notice that leftists in America have no problem in calling for the "return" of all refugees worldwide, except when it comes to the Palestinian refugees, there they want "a fair and agreed on" resolution. Would you say that about refugees from Afghanistan and Iraq? Fair to whom? The occupiers of the lands?