what is NOT fair and balanced in coverage of Syria?

Look at this sentence:  "Indeed, Assad now appears stronger than he did two years ago. Backed by Russia, Iran and volunteer militias from Lebanon and Iraq".  Why not follow up this sentence--if you want to be fair and balanced--with something like this: while the variety of Syrian rebels receive a variety of aid from US, UK, France, Germany, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Jordan, UAE, Qatar, and Bahrain, among other countries of the world that the US grouped as "Friends of Syria". Why?