Hasan Nasrallah addressed the explosive Wikileaks revelations in Al-Akhbar. He said that the party is preparing a legal case against those who urged Israel to invade Lebanon with ground forces. But he implied that Walid Jumblat's case is settled because he shifted positions as of late. But what kind of logic is that? Jumblat can be forgiven because of his political shifts? If anything, it makes his political shifts all the more unturstworthy. By Nasrallah's logic, Antoine Lahd can be forgiven if he joins March 8 coalition?