Of course, no one ever takes the silly US-Israeli Hariri international court in the Hague seriously, and the Western media re wise in ignoring it. But just this sample about the proceeding of the court and the comatose defense teams there. John Abdu (one of the closest advisers to Rafiq Hariri) said in a TV interview months ago: that we need to admit that Rafiq Hariri was involved in the formulation of UNSC 1559 and that he was jubilant when it was passed. He added: anyone who says otherwise is a liar. Hariri friend, Faysal Salman said in his testimony in the court that Rafiq Hariri was opposed to the UNSC 1559. Walid Jumblat said something similar: that Hariri was opposed to 1559. Media adviser to Hariri, Hani Hammud, yesterday, said that Hariri never really expressed views, positively or negatively about the UNSC 1559. That was a blatant lie under oath but the defense team is deep asleep to contradict him. Hariri vocally and repeatedly said that he was opposed to 1559 and that he favors Ta'if instead.
PS Abdul was the only one who told the truth on the matter above.
PS Abdul was the only one who told the truth on the matter above.
