As you know, I do read the production of Zionists in the media and academia, often times to relish their poverty of ideas and logic. I also enjoy realizing that Zionist propaganda in the 21st century is as bad, crude, and vulgar as Ba`thist propaganda of the 20th century. Take Stephen Norwood's Anti-Semitism and the American Far Left published by Cambridge University Press. The author maintains: "Of course, administrators consistently ignore situations when campus opponents of Israel create a hostile environment for Jewish students." (p. 239). Of course, he does not tell us how and why this is related to "the far left" and he does not even bother to explain as for the evidence of his generalization about campuses across the US? He relies on "One student testified that her Islamic studies professor told her she was not "Semitic".(p. 239). He also claims (shame on Cambridge University Press if not for publishing the propaganda of this book at least for the stupidity between its covers) "many university administrators" adopted the "Bandung Conference" and he adds that the Bandung conference is anti-Semitic because Nasser and Sukarno excluded Israel from it. (p. 238). I am not making this up. He also faults the "New Left"--not to be confused with the "Far Left" of the book for undermining "public perception of the Holocaust as unique by accusing the United States of waging a genocidal war in Vietnam". So in order to preserve the uniqueness of the Holocaust, we should have maintained that the US was being merciful and kind in Vietnam? Of course, like all Zionists he freely uses anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism interchangeably or he uses this expression: "virulent anti-Zionism laced with anti-Semitism" (p. 236). I have one question for Cambridge University Press: would they publish a book that claims that Arab and Muslim students in the US suffer from a "hostile environment" due to the overwhelming Zionism of the country? The guy is so lacking in basic knowledge and elementary education that he claims that "university courses on European, American, and Middle Eastern history have rarely addressed the issue of anti-Semitism, or even the Jewish experience". (p. 236). I really would like to meet the professors who read this manuscript and recommended its publication.