Look how both the New York Times and the Washington Post told their leaders that Netanyahu's speech against peace was actually good for peace

Here is the New York Times:  "though in an apparent nod to emerging diplomatic efforts, he sought to prescribe precise conditions for a deal, including that Iran stop enriching uranium."

Here is the Washington Post:  "Although criticized immediately by the Iranian delegation, Netanyahu’s hard-line position could give Tehran incentive to make headway during international negotiations, which have proved fruitless in the past."

But this is the US press: Israeli leaders talk and do wars, and US media insist: no, Israeli leaders only talk peace and make peace.