""Other experts note that the court's prosecutors have indicted only
suspects from conflicts in Africa, which have not offered a true test of United
States support for the court. "The U.S. wants to be at the table when the I.C.C.
doesn't touch on issues of vital interest to it," said Philippe Sands, author of
"Lawless World," who teaches international law at University College in London.
"I suspect the U.S. position would change direction rather quickly if issues of
vital interest began to be investigated." He offered as possible examples
investigations of Israel, Afghanistan and the treatment of prisoners during the
United States-led war on terrorism. Others see the growing cooperation with the
court as a way for the United States to regain the moral standing they contend
it lost as a result of the war in Iraq and the scandals surrounding
waterboarding and other harsh treatment of prisoners. "It deflects attention
from the past American violations of international law and their own judicial
anomalies like torture and disappearances," said Antoine Bernard, a director of
the International Federation for Human Rights, a group with members in more than
160 countries."" (thanks Amir)