And now a word on Syria from a neutral observer

"In a briefing in Tel Aviv, an Israeli military official was vague about the exact nature of the evidence, saying that it was drawn from an examination of photographs of victims and some “direct” findings that he would not specify."  Is it not amazing that the Times would publish a long article all based on the unsubstantiated claim by an Israeli official?  (The answer of course is: no, it is not amazing at all if you know anything about Zionist media).