You read it here first, months ago during the festival of lies about the "Iron Dome":
""Iron
Dome’s intercept rate, defined as destruction of the rocket's warhead was
relatively low, perhaps as low as 5%, but could well be lower."
This
astonishing figure, which casts a shadow of doubt on the figures published by
the Israel Defense Forces regarding the Iron Dome missile defense
system, was suggested by Professor Theodore Postol, a world-renowned scientist
and expert in missile defense.
Postol,
and two other rocket scientists, Dr. Mordechai Shefer, formerly of Rafael, and
D., a scientist who until recently worked for Raytheon, the manufacturer of
PATRIOT missiles, investigated the performance of Iron Dome performance during Operation Pillar of Defense and
all reached similar conclusions: Iron Dome’s rate of success did not come close
to the figure of 84% as reported by the IDF.
According
to the three scientists, who conducted their research separately by analyzing
dozens of videos filmed during the operation, most of the explosions which look
as if they were successful interceptions, are actually just the self-destruction
of the Iron Dome’s own missiles. The scientists point out that in every case the
explosions, seen as balls of fire during the day and clouds of smoke at night,
were round and symmetrical. In the case of successful interceptions, in which
the incoming missile’s warhead is destroyed, there should have been another ball
of fire or cloud of smoke.
They
also uncovered a strange phenomenon whereby the Iron Dome’s missiles followed
identical trajectories, and self-destructed at precisely the same time. In some
of the videos, it appears that the Iron Dome’s missiles made a very sharp turn
shortly before self-destruction. That cannot be, say the scientists, as there is
no way that the missile defense system could “remember” that it needs to turn in
the direction of the incoming Grad missile a quarter-second before it
self-destructs.
In
some cases, it seems as if the trajectories of Iron Dome missiles were
preset.
In many cases, the Iron Dome’s missiles are seen taking a sharp plunge, and chasing after the incoming rockets from behind. In such a scenario, the chances that the interceptor could come into close enough proximity to destroy the incoming missile’s warhead are miniscule. In order to destroy an incoming missile’s warhead, the Iron Dome missile would need to follow a trajectory that would result in a direct hit, or at least a hit at a sharp angle."
In many cases, the Iron Dome’s missiles are seen taking a sharp plunge, and chasing after the incoming rockets from behind. In such a scenario, the chances that the interceptor could come into close enough proximity to destroy the incoming missile’s warhead are miniscule. In order to destroy an incoming missile’s warhead, the Iron Dome missile would need to follow a trajectory that would result in a direct hit, or at least a hit at a sharp angle."