""The West was sometimes criticized for adopting a
Machiavellian posture during the 1980s Iran-Iraq war by hoping that neither side
won outright, but such criticism was not warranted. A clear victory for either
side would have been a disaster for the region and the world. The same approach
is warranted in Syria: working to prevent either side from winning a total
victory so that both sides will be more inclined to reach a compromise. To
accomplish this, the United States and its allies must consider the use of
unconventional warfare techniques undertaken directly by very small numbers of
allied forces, not indigenous Syrian ones." "By carrying out small-scale
unconventional warfare, the United States and its allies could work toward
balancing the conflict and putting a fear into the Syrian regime that it might
actually lose the civil war. At the same time, this strategy would not allow for
independent military capacity-building by the opposition, which might give it
the sense that it could win the war. Both sides must fear defeat.""