"How many people have been killed by these unmanned aircraft in the
Central Intelligence Agency’s strikes in Yemen and Pakistan? How many of
the dead identified as “militants” are really civilians? How many are
children? The Bureau of Investigative Journalism in Britain has estimated that, in the first three years after President Obama took office, between 282 and 535 civilians were credibly reported killed by drone strikes — including more than 60 children. The United States government says the number of civilians killed has been far lower. Accurate information is hard to come by. The Obama administration and the C.I.A. are secretive about the fast-growing drone program. The strikes in Pakistan are taking place in areas
where reporters can’t go, or would be in extreme danger if they did.
And it is all happening at a time when the American public seems tired
of hearing about this part of the world anyway. How does The New York Times fit into this hazy picture?.But The Times has not been without fault. Since the article in May, its reporting has not aggressively challenged
the administration’s description of those killed as “militants” —
itself an undefined term. And it has been criticized for giving
administration officials the cover of anonymity when they suggest that critics of drones are terrorist sympathizers. Americans, according to polls, have a positive view of drones, but
critics say that’s because the news media have not informed them well."