"First, we did clarify that these documents were obtained from opposition
sources; as professional journalists, we obviously knew that this
naturally means that they (our sources) may have been selective in what
they chose to share with us.
Then, we did mention upfront that our sources declined to inform us how
they managed to obtained these highly confidential files." If you have all these caveats, should you not as an (un)professional outfit have refrained from publishing them?