People in the Western press who write favorably about Saudi tyranny because they simply follow the dictates of America foreign policy orientations--no matter what (is it not shameful that Saudi Arabia even after Sep. 11 does not get denounced in the US press, and mainstream Western writers, like David Ignatius and Thomas Friedman and other Zionists write fawning articles about polygamous Saudi princes) have no clue how vulgar, crude, and pathetic the press of the Saudi princes are. I mean the mouthpiece of Prince Salman, Ash-Sharq Al-Awsat, referred to the arrest of Shaykh An-Nimr as the arrest of an "instigator of fitnah" (civil war or sectarian discord).