From Angry Arab's chief Bahrain correspondent: "Something strange is happening. Bahrain rearrested Mohammad AlBuflasa. He was
the uprising's first political prisoner. They kidnapped him and he went missing
for a while until the government announced that they imprisoned him. They
released him last July. He was very controversial because he was one of the few
sunni salafis who openly supported the uprising and spoke at pearl roundabout,
and even more extraordinary, he is a former army officer - remember that the
regime only recruits loyalist families to the army. Sunni salafiis tend to be
sunnis from an arab najdi background, whether tribal or not tribal. Because they
share a common background with the royal family (as opposed to the baharna who
are Bahrain's original inhabitants and the persian bahrainis), they tend to be
staunchly loyal to the royal family. Most are actually not rich but they have
guaranteed jobs in the army. Because AlBuflasa comes from this background, his
speaking at the roundabout really pissed the regime off. However he was also one
of the first prisoners of the uprising who was released. I think the regime
realized that they went overboard because they were targeting members of what is
traditionally thought of being their base. Now what is really interesting is
that in the last few months, more people from this group have been criticizing
the regime, the most prominent being Member of Parliament AlTamimi who openly
called for the Prime Minister to resign. This was unprecedented - even
AlBuflasa didn't go this far. I don't know how to read AlBuflasa's rearrest.
After he was released he was forced to write a letter apologizing to the regime
which was published in one of the pro-regime newspapers. Unlike high profile
political prisoners who went straight back to openly criticizing the government
Buflasa disappeared from the public eye. After a while he started tweeting but
his tweets were limited to talk of unity and very vague criticisms. In the last
two months or so, he became vocal again and started openly criticizing the
government because he wasn't allowed to leave the country. At about the same
time, AlTamimi called for the PM to resign and then his house was attacked in
response to that. I think the regime is freaking out - it treated its base like
shit (they had guaranteed jobs in the army but were otherwise very poor) because
they thought that they would always be loyal to them no matter what (due to
tribal allegiances). Now there are people from this base that are turning
against them. Does this mean that there are more people that are silent? Does
this mean that more people oppose the regime than we thought? Maybe, maybe not.
A family member told me something really smart a few weeks ago - If someone
isn't openly defending the regime (everyone in Bahrain is on twitter), then they
are against the government. They might not want to overthrow the regime like
Feb14 and they might even not want the same level of reforms that the legal
opposition want, but they are definitely not loyalists. Otherwise they would be
openly declaring their loyalty right?
One more thing I remembered - attendance Gathering for the National Unity (jam3iyat alwi7da alwa6aniya), a loyalist group rally is support of the Bahraini-Saudi union was dismal. Where did all the government loyalists go? Well we know that a portion of them are part of the group of the Youth of AlFateh which is a splinter group of the Gathering for the National Loyalty that feel that the government is taking believe it or not too weak of a stance against the "traitors." But what about the rest who are not part of that group? Why was attendance so low? I mean the Saudi-Bahrain union is a central issue for the loyalists. So if very few of them attended, what does that tell you? Of course another problem with the Gathering for the National Unity (I think this is the english name for the organization but I'm not sure) is that they have no vision or goals other than opposing the opposition.
One more thing I remembered - attendance Gathering for the National Unity (jam3iyat alwi7da alwa6aniya), a loyalist group rally is support of the Bahraini-Saudi union was dismal. Where did all the government loyalists go? Well we know that a portion of them are part of the group of the Youth of AlFateh which is a splinter group of the Gathering for the National Loyalty that feel that the government is taking believe it or not too weak of a stance against the "traitors." But what about the rest who are not part of that group? Why was attendance so low? I mean the Saudi-Bahrain union is a central issue for the loyalists. So if very few of them attended, what does that tell you? Of course another problem with the Gathering for the National Unity (I think this is the english name for the organization but I'm not sure) is that they have no vision or goals other than opposing the opposition.
On the other hand, attendance opposition demonstration against the
Saudi-Bahraini union was in the 10s of thousands.
There was a period of time that I started doubting that the opposition were
the supermajority (always thought that they were the majority but was unclear by
how much). I thought, especially because of political naturalization, that
loyalists made up around 40% of the population. I think the number is much less
especially if you count people who do not necessary support february 14 or the
opposition but also do not support the government. This group is completely
silentI (obviously there are people who support the opposition too that have
been silenced but people generally know who they are).
I am not saying of course that the regime is weak. Far from it. They have
managed to built a security apparatus that is completely loyal to the royal
family. There is no chance of portions of the army defecting. On top of that you
have the support of the US and Saudi Arabia."