Akram sent me this: "In a statement to Reuters, just before being re-elected (Reuters was wrong: he
was actually elected -not re-elected- "democratically in an environment of
transparency and integrity" à la Ba'asist) as the head of SNC, Burhan Ghalioun
expressed his intention to bring support to a new strategy for "liberating
Syria":
"We do not deal weapons but we will make some agreements and some countries promised us that they would provide the Free Syrian Army with weapons,"
"We do not deal weapons but we will make some agreements and some countries promised us that they would provide the Free Syrian Army with weapons,"
- It seems too
late for the great opportunist Burhan Ghaliuon
- If he's looking for "some agreements", the question is: what does he have to give (on behalf of Syria for sure) in return?
- Does this plain expression of this strategy (not of the own thoughts of this silly puppet of course) explain what's going on in north Lebanon? I mean, are we witnessing the build up of a hub where the promised weapon shipments (and militants) can be freely imported then re-exported to Syria?"
