From Le Monde Diplomatique (February): "Even so, the book chronicles war crimes: a mentally handicapped Palestinian
beaten so badly that he bleeds all over; Palestinian passers-by sent to detonate
suspected bombs at the top of a minaret because the military robot cannot climb
the stairs; the killing of a unarmed Palestinian because he was standing on a
rooftop (“Why did I shoot, you ask me today? Just out of pressure. I surrendered
to the pressure of the guys,” according to one testimony). There are also the
premeditated executions of unarmed Palestinian policemen in revenge for an
attack on a checkpoint; the orders from a high-ranking officer on how to deal
with a presumed terrorist lying wounded or dead (“You approach the corpse, you
put a [gun] barrel between its teeth and shoot”); the stealing, looting or
destruction of property. But “this book is not a Tsahal [army] horror
show,” said Stoler. “It is the story of a generation, our generation.” In the
first 30 years after the 1967 war, much of the debate within Israel centred on
the occupation — the need for it, its evils — but in the last 15 years the word
has almost disappeared. Israelis will talk about Judea and Samaria, or the West
Bank, or just “the territories”, without using the word “occupied”. The word
“occupation” became almost taboo, not to be spoken in public. I was working on a
television show and one of the guests said that violence in Israeli society was
rising “because of the occupation”. My colleagues in the control room were
alarmed. They pleaded with me — tell the anchorman to ask the guest to take back
the word. As if it had the power to burn them." (thanks Fred)