Ayman Mohyeldin wants NATO in Syria

This article is full of cliches not insights. I mean look at this sentence; it is as if taken from Bush's speeches when talking about Ahmad Chalabi:  "Those fighting for change are fighting for a cause – freedom."  That is supposed to be poetic, by the way.  Notice that he is unrestrained in his language in talking about the lousy Syrian regime.  Would this Mohyeldin ever ever dare call for NATO to intervene against the Israeli regime? Not in a million years.  Most importantly, aside from the need to overthrow the Syrian regime, isn't Libya a case where we know that the outcome of NATO intervention is a monster-in-power?  And notice that as soon as Mohyeldin took his new job with NBC, he immediately subscribes to the language of Western Zionist media.  Notice how he is at pains to reassure Israelis that intervention would not hurt him and notice that in the article he is worried about Hizbullah but not about Israeli war crimes.   I guess when I had criticized him a year or so ago, I was right.  Many of you back then criticized me.  (thanks Mysa)