Hariri tribunal

Now yesterday, the New York Times wrote an entire editorial calling for the world to press ahead with the Hariri tribunal.  If one is dumb or not yet born, one would accept that the New York Times and other Zionist voices are really distraught over the death of Hariri and really wants to find the truth about his murder.  Does one believe that, really?  And of all the assassinations in the Middle East (and of people far more important than Hariri, like lousy Arafat and others like Abu Iyad, Abu Jihad, Abu Al-Hawl, Kamal Nasir, Abu Ali Mustafa, and many others most of whom killed by the terrorist regime in Israel), why is this one so far more important?  Someone needs to explain that to me to convince me that Zionists are really upset over his death and really want to find the truth--for no other reason and with no ulterior motive.  As we say in Lebanon, go play in the garden.