Saturday, January 17, 2009
How New York Times slips, daily and hourly
"But the Gaza branch of Hamas, squabbling with exiles out of the line of Israeli fire, seems to have agreed to much of Egypt’s cease-fire proposal." Early on during the Israeli terrorist attack on Gaza, the New York Times would habitually inserts Israeli terrorist propaganda claims but would attribute those claims to their Israeli terrorist sources. As the Israeli terrorist campaign proceeds, the newspaper would insert Israeli terrorist propaganda claims but without attributing it to its sources. It becomes facts with no need to substantiate. Take this passage above: How did Ethan Bronner know that there is squabbling among Hamas leaders? Did he himself employ devices to eavesdrop on their conversations? Of coruse, not. He got this from his Israeli terrorist sources and put it without menting it it came from the Israeli terrorist military.