Who the hell does the New York Times think it is? You have to read this arrogant editorial in which this esteemed newspaper instructs the Iraqi people about what they should do. "It should be transitional The specific details about regional boundaries, federal powers and the role of Islamic law should not be enshrined in the constitutional text, but left to future elected parliaments." Imagine if a Lebanese newspaper writes an editorial instructing the US about how it should draft its constitution? Well, I tell you what. I think that the New York Times SHOULD stop issuing instructions and SHOULD stop pontificating, and go back to doing what it does best: printing superficial stories about the real reasons behind the split between R. Murdoch and his son. (They ran something like 6 stories on that so far).