There was an editorial in the New York Times from a few days ago. I don't really like to link to them but it was about the Arab League mission in Syria. The tone of the editorial really bothered me. In it, the Zionist--whoever he/she was--writer basically orders the mission to do this and that. It made me wonder: on what basis does the New York Times think that it has any credibility on Arab issues? Does it think that its long record on racism and bigotry against Arabs and its unconditional endorsement of Israeli war crimes qualify it to pontificate on Arab issues?